Thursday, June 21, 2012

Is drinking soda really that bad for you?


Read the low down on drinking soda. Great report from CNN News! Personally, I prefer Water.

Editor's note: Dr. Melina Jampolis, CNN's diet and fitness expert, is a physician nutrition specialist and the author of "The Calendar Diet: A Month by Month Guide to Losing Weight While Living Your Life."
(CNN) -- Q: I've heard so much about the dangers of drinking soda. Is it really all that bad for you? Or is it just empty calories?
You may have heard about a new study published in the May issue of the American Journal of Nutrition that found an increased risk of stroke in people who consumed more than one soda per day.
These findings are not surprising in light of the growing body of evidence linking intake of sugar sweetened beverages -- of which soda makes up the largest percentage -- and diseases such as......

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, November 15, 2010

The Skinny on Artificial Sweeteners

The average American eats 24 pounds of artificial sweeteners per year. We put them in our coffee, we drink them in our diet sodas and we use them to watch our sugars and to cut our calories.

Saccharin was America’s first artificial sweetener, revolutionizing the American diet in the 1950’s. It went from a godsend for dieters to a sugar substitute for diabetics. At the height of its popularity in 1977 researchers suspected saccharin might cause cancer. But lack of evidence and soaring customer demand kept it from being banned.

Soon other artificial sweeteners began popping up. Three groups of artificial sweeteners are currently on the market. They are Aspartame (Equal), Sucralose (Splenda) and Saccharin (Sweet and Low). The most common place we consume sugar substitutes is soda, but they can also be found in 6,000 other products sold in the US including; baby food, snack foods, frozen dinners, breads and yogurts.

But are artificial sweeteners really keeping the pounds off and what effect do they really have on our bodies?

A lot of us choose artificial sweeteners to save some calories but the latest research is showing the very opposite effect may occur. On seeing, smelling, or tasting the food or drink sweetened with a sugar substitute, our bodies perceive it as real sugar. In order to transport the anticipated sugar to muscle and organ cells to be used as fuel, insulin surges into your bloodstream.

Once there, the insulin finds that no sugar has been metabolized from the sugar-free food we have just eaten. Needing to “couple” with sugar, it may pull whatever blood sugar there is out of your bloodstream, signaling your liver to store it away as fat.

When we eat or drink only sugarless foods, we are left with high insulin levels and blood sugar swings that are quite likely to set off intense cravings for carbohydrates and start your body into a fat-making/storing cycle.

Dieters can find themselves in an endless cycle of suffering cravings, weakness and irritability and although they may fight off the urge to cheat, they still see little real progress in their weight loss never knowing that the real culprit was right in front of them in that innocent sugar substitute they had always assumed was their friend.

When our bodies evolved a few million years ago, sugar substitutes did not exist. Our bodies were made to handle “real sugar” and to this day treat anything that tastes sweet as if it contains real sugar. There is no way around it; if something tastes sweet, your body assumes it contains sugar and releases insulin, the hunger hormone, the fat making hormone.

Diabetes is a huge problem and there are 2 ways artificial sweeteners might be linked to it. One of them is weight gain. In type 2 diabetes, what you have is insulin resistance which means our bodies have quit paying attention to those repeated signals for lots of insulin. Artificial sweeteners could be the ultimate “crying wolf” to our bodies, by signaling an insulin spike again and again. This has not been proven in people yet but we do know that people who use a lot of artificial sweeteners are about twice as likely to get diabetes as others.

Labels: ,